Calibration Traceability: What Your Quality Standard Requires
Does Your Quality Standard Require ISO/IEC 17025 Accreditation? Many quality managers assume that ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation is universally required...
Shipping an instrument to a calibration lab is the default approach for good reason, and it works well for most equipment. But for certain instruments, especially those that are fixed in place or sensitive to their installed environment, bringing calibration to your facility is the better, or only workable, option. The table below breaks down the factors that typically point one direction or the other.
|
Factor |
Favors On-Site |
Favors In-Lab |
|
Instrument size/installation |
Fixed installations: furnaces, permanently mounted survey control equipment |
Portable, easy to package and ship without disassembly |
|
Sensitivity to environment change |
Instruments whose accuracy depends on their installed environment or mounting |
Instruments unaffected by a change in location or handling |
|
Downtime tolerance |
Equipment that can't be pulled from service for a shipping round-trip |
Equipment with a backup unit or schedule flexibility |
|
Volume and mix of instruments |
Large, multi-discipline instrument lists where one visit is more efficient than many shipments |
A handful of instruments better suited to a controlled lab environment |
|
Required lab conditions |
N/A |
Instruments requiring tightly controlled temperature/humidity beyond what's practical to replicate on-site |
A furnace's thermocouples, controllers, and recording instruments are calibrated in place because the furnace itself can't be shipped, and because the instrumentation's performance in its actual installed configuration is what a heat-treat compliance program like BAC 5602 or CQI-9 actually needs verified. On-site calibration here isn't a convenience; it's the only practical method.
Total stations, GNSS receivers, and related survey equipment are often calibrated on-site specifically because field verification against known control points reflects how the instrument actually performs under real working conditions, not just how it performs on a bench in a lab.
A properly run on-site visit follows the same documentation discipline as an in-lab calibration: as-found measurements are recorded before any adjustment, calibration is performed against traceable reference standards brought to your facility, and as-left results are documented on a full certificate, not an abbreviated field note.
The accreditation your calibration provider holds applies to the process itself, not to a specific building. A properly accredited provider produces the same quality of certificate whether the work happens in their lab or at your facility. This traceability question is covered in more depth in our article on calibration traceability requirements, including which quality standards actually require it and which only recommend it.
A few things make an on-site visit go smoothly:
CTPM provides on-site calibration services nationwide. Contact CTPM to discuss your facility's location and confirm scheduling for on-site service.
→ Schedule Your On Site Calibration
Does Your Quality Standard Require ISO/IEC 17025 Accreditation? Many quality managers assume that ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation is universally required...
Why Dimensional Accuracy Compounds Across a Process Dimensional measurement error rarely stays contained to a single reading. When a caliper or gauge...